Blog
Policy

Welcome to our blog. Through it, we hope to offer insight into or products and technology, as well as some general news that we hope may affect your transportation habits.

Yesterday, we closed the office doors her at Goose Networks and headed across the street to World Cup Alley, to watch the Uruguay v. Netherlands match. In the moments our attention wasn't fixed on the Flying Dutchmen and Diego Forlán's booming shots on goal, we noticed a small display for PARK(ing) Day.

The idea behind PARK(ing) Day is simple enough; a one-day event where artists, activists, and citizens independently but simultanesously transform metered parking spots into 'PARK(ing)' spaces, i.e. temporary public parks. Now an annual event in a handful of cities across the globe, PARK(ing) Day got it's start in San Francisco in 2005. There, an art collective known as Rebar, devised a creative exploration of how urban public space is allocated and used. For example, up to 70% of San Francisco's downtown outdoor space is dedicated to the vehicle, while only a fraction of that space is allocated to the public realm.

Rebar's premise: 'Paying the meter of a parking space enables one to lease precious urban real estate on a short-term basis. What is the range of possible activities for this short-term lease?' The 2005 result was a converted a single metered parking space into a temporary public park in an area of San Francisco that is underserved by public open space.

Today, PARK(ing) Day has grown into a global project as local organizations have begun to organize events in their own locales. Here in Seattle, the effort is being led by Feet First, a local non-profit dedicated to promoting walkable communities in the Puget Sound region, and is scheduled for Friday, September 17.

After the Netherlands 3-2 win, as I shuffled out of World Cup Alley alongside my 60 or so fellow spectators, I found myself thinking of how nice it was to share an experience with other local office workers, in a space normally reserved for trash pick-up and other less savory activities.

Would PARK(ing) day have a similar positive impact? I cerntainly hope so, though I suspect having the good fortune of a televised international sporting event wouldn't hurt...

The San Francisco County Transportation Authority recently released a report on the role of shuttle services in San Francisco's transportation system. The study seeks to document the role of shuttles citywide, with a focus on examining the operations of regional employer shuttles within San Francisco neighborhoods. The study was spurred by the significant growth in recent years of shuttle operations in San Francisco, especially private employer-provided regional shuttles which provide direct service to the employment site from either residential neighborhood stops, or from major transit hubs (e.g. BART, Muni, or Caltrain stations).

The conclusion: "Shuttles play a valuable role in the overall San Franscisco transportation." The report goes on to discuss the significant and widespread benefits of regional employer shuttles.

From the public perspective, these benefits include congestion and air quality improvements. Respondents to a survey included in the study felt that after the introduction of shuttle services noted that parking on the street also bacame easier, which respondents attributed to some of the people riding shuttle buses having given up their cards.

Employers should also take note of the responses of respondents who were themselves shuttle riders. Many of these respondents said that the provision of shuttle services by their employer was key to their employment and residential location choice. A full 14% of employee respondents stated they would leave their current employment if the shuttle service were unavailable, 92% of respondents indicated that they gained productive work time by riding the shuttle, and 86% said they also gained personal time.

"Free Parking is a fertility drug for cars"

This quote, attributed to Donald Shoup, was logged in the comments to an LA Streetsblog post about a Los Angeles City Council resolution advocating free parking to "the highest tech and cleanest cars".  This follows the termination earlier this year of a program that provided HOV exemption stickers to any hybrid vehicles. 

LA is home to Shoup, a UCLA professor of Urban Planning and the author of The High Cost of Free Parking.  Shoup's strategies have been implemented most notably in Santa Monica and San Francisco. He calls for the elimination of building codes that require free parking to ensure that spots are available to those willing to pay, thus ending the pattern of drivers circling a neighborhood multiple times in search of a spot. 

The intent of the LA City Council resolution, to encourage the use of fuel efficient vehicles, seems desirable to manufacturers like Tesla and Toyota.  Beyond purchase decisions by those with the means to consider a pricey electric vehicle, behavioral change from such a resolution seems unlikely.  As Shoup has shown through decades of research and writing, the cost of parking heavily influences transportation decisions.  Far too often parking costs are artificially dampened by regulations and building codes.  Legislation to cap or eliminate fees adds another layer hiding the true cost of parking and such layers tend to be much harder to remove than to apply. 

Yesterday the New York Times summarized the growing debate over a mileage tax as a replacement or supplement to the current state and federal fuel tax.  As the article reminds us, the federal gas tax (18.4 cents per gal) has not changed since 1993. 

Also today the Times covers the rise in transit ridership in 2008.  Figures just released show that ridership hit a 52 year high.   Unfortunately for many transit agencies this spike in demand come at a time when funding is drying up. 

What happens when a system gets too crowded?  The interstate highway system grew rapidly in the 50's.  Since 1960, growth in road miles has been flat, averaging around 2.6% per decade.  On the other hand, road use as measured in vehicle miles traveled (VMT), has grown at a much more rapid clip.  Our analysis of Federal Transportation data showed a 250% increased in vehicle miles traveled between 1960 and 2000.  During the same period the number of road miles increased by only 11%.  Same roads and more miles = congestion and wear & tear. 

While some of this VMT increase comes from more cars on the road the majority of the growth is in per capita mileage.  For a nice analysis and an introduction to Jevons paradox check this post from metcaffeination.

Recent discussion of a mileage tax is causing a minor political dustup.  There is a summary today in Crosscut by Matt Rosenberg from the Cascadia Center at the Discovery Institute.  A standard reaction to the idea of a tax on miles driven is, " just raise the gas tax and provide incentive to use more fuel efficient vehicles."  As the Crosscut article states, the gas tax "sends poor price signals to motorists".  The article adds that a mileage tax "would clarify the linkage between driving and the needs of a poorly maintained and underpriced system."

It's a safe bet that deliberation on a VMT tax will be protracted and contentious.  Whether or not you agree with the premise of a mileage tax the Crosscut article and metcaffeination post will get you ready to join the debate. 

Executive summary of the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission final report (released on Feb 26).

Portland Transport summary of pilot program tracking VMT.

We've written before about the challenge facing public transit as demand for service increases.  The New York Times covered the "rider paradox" in a story this week.  Here in Seattle buses are packed and another fare increase was just approved.  Transit agencies across the country are cutting service and raising fares

While the stimulus package winds through Congress it is worth noting the levels of proposed investment in transit ($3b is a potential but not guaranteed figure) versus the public money already doled out to seemingly healthly banks and credit card firms.  As an example, credit card goliath Capitol One received $3.5B in December and promptly bought failing Chevy Chase Bank while claiming they did not need the bailout funds to complete the deal.  That leads to the obvious question of why they needed bailout funds in the first place. 

Hopefully we'll see more federal funds directed towards public transit which, as the Times article points out, facilitates employment for lower income workers. 


 

If you pay for a transit pass to get to work or pay for onsite parking, you may already be taking advantage of a section in the tax code that allows for payment with pre-tax dollars.  Currently employers can subsidize up to $120 per month on transit and up to $230 per month on parking. 

If that imbalance seems odd to you you're not alone, at least not on this blog.  We were heartened to hear that the incoming administration has stated their intent to equalize these benefits and create additional incentives to get people out of their cars

Does your employer cover the cost of onsite parking?  How about transit?  If you are a non-parker do you receive any additional compensation for choosing not to take up a space?  With onsite parking potentially adding almost $3,000 in tax free comp it's not a trivial issue. 

Our friends at the Sightline Institute posted some analysis today on the number of work hours required to fill a 15 gallon gas tank.  Take a look

 

 

 

Over the past week, average gas prices dropped below $3 in several midwest states.  Gas is now below $3.50 per gallon (on average) everywhere but Alaska and Hawaii.  The Associated Press published an article on the likely trend for gas prices in the months to come.  Below is the trailing 12 month price average from AAA

 

While prices should stay low for the next couple of months they are likely to trend back up in the Spring.  Coupled with a period of general belt-tightening due to the broader slowdown in the economy, demand is likely to stay high for cost effective alternatives to driving alone.  Here is the 12 month moving average for vehicle miles traveled going back to 1983. 

There have been a slew of recent articles about the dilemma facing public transit agencies.  With ridership increasing in lock step with fuel costs many agencies face record ridership and record deficits. 

The New York Times has an article today about Rochester NY and how the Rochester Regional Transit Service is breaking a nationwide trend and lowering bus fares.  Is there a blueprint here for other cities?  Not exactly.  The details of Rochester's transit turnaround make comparisons to larger cities misleading. 

The article explains that Rochester Transit received over 50% of their $62m budget in state aid.  Rochester runs just 265 buses compared to over 4,500 along with 6,200 subway cars in New York.  Rochester Transit also receives $10m per year from the local school district which provides city buses passes to all it's students at a rate of more than 2x the published fare. 

Transit agencies tend to cover about 25-40% of their operating costs with fares.  Seems Rochester is pretty typical after all. 

 

~